Fears mean fire cuts bid is on hold

By <b>Ian Dipple Friday 13 June 2014 Updated: 16/06 14:15

PLANS to cut fire cover in Redditch have been put on hold for a second time amid concerns about how the service will cope.

Councillors have demanded more information on how fire cover will be provided in future and for alternatives to the proposed cuts to be explored.

The idea of holding a referendum in May 2015 asking residents to vote on paying more in their council tax to avoid the cuts will also be examined ahead of Hereford and Worcester Fire and Rescue Authority’s next meeting in September.

The original proposals by Hereford and Worcester Fire and Rescue Service would see the second retained fire crew at Redditch axed as well as those at Tenbury Wells and Ledbury, along with the second full-time crew at Worcester and Hereford in a bid to save £1.7million.

In February councillors agreed to take £485,000 from the authority’s savings to give officers time to look at how to minimise the impact of the proposals. At a meeting of the authority on Monday (June 9) it was outlined the cuts would still have to go-ahead but could be delayed for between two and five years.

However during an emotion charged meeting councillors voiced concerns there were alternatives which had not been considered.

They also claimed there was not enough detail about the availability of retained crews and what would happen if a significant number of retained firefighters left the service because work commitments meant they could not respond to increased call-outs.

Particular concern was expressed about the plan to leave Herefordshire with just one full-time crew, making it the only county in England with such poor fire cover.

Coun Jim Kenyon called the cuts the ‘biggest risk to life in Herefordshire since the Second World War.’

Coun Richard Udall added: “We must not rush this decision. If we do and we make the wrong decision lives are at stake.”

Steve Gould, secretary of the Hereford and Worcester branch of the FBU, said the public - over 16,000 of which signed a petition against the cuts - should get the final say through a referendum.

“The public pay our wages let them decide what fire cover they want. If they say they won’t pay for it then we’ve got no argument,” he said.

“We have got slim fire cover as it is, we are a very lean brigade. Cut us any further and we are no longer lean, we are getting to dangerous levels of fire cover.”

Chief Fire Officer Mark Yates said the latest delay would continue the uncertainty for staff.

“We will find some other options, whether they are acceptable to the fire authority, the staff and the trade unions is another matter,” he said.

“Underlying all this is the fact there is no more money.”

Share This

Popular »

1 Man glassed outside nightclub

2 Coldplay and Neil Young come back

3 Slashed with broken bottle during attack

4 Greater success is aim of new head

5 Teen girls approached by man

More news »

Drug smuggler suspect has links to Redditch

POLICE are hunting a suspected drug smuggler who

Anniversary sees calls renewed

CONCERNS over safety and capacity need to be

Flowers fill the church

RESIDENTS are in for a blooming great time

Trust move set to secure future of Abbey

CONTROL of the Abbey Stadium could be handed

Regional news »


Bromsgrove Standard
Phones4u administration sees risk to Bromsgrove and Northfield jobs

PHONES4u stores across Bromsgrove and Northfield have been closed after ...

Worcester Observer

Visit the Worcester Observer website for the latest.

Stratford Observer
Cyclist bikes 300 miles in 24 hours for charity

A CYCLIST has overcome his 'hardest physical challenge' to raise ...

Evesham Observer
Calling all young masterchefs......

THE OBSERVER has teamed up with the Evesham Hotel to ...